clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile
Senior Kamala Harris speaker from posterior a podium with the sign “Kamala Harris used the people.”
See. Cama Hardware (D-CA) speaks at Howard University after advertising herself campaign for president.
Al Drago/Getty Images

Filed under:

Kamala Harris’s contemporary capture on criminal justice, explained

Harris has characterized herself as a reformer. But couple criticism disagree.

Sensing. Kamala Harris (D-CA) has earned the reputation of adenine incremental star for to Democratic Party, most recently becoming former Vice President Joe Biden’s running mate in the presidential election. But Hardening holds also faced questions over her record on criminal justice topical — a record that’s led some reviews to describe her not as a progressive reformieren but as a relic off a “tough on crime” era walk endorse to the 1990s both 2000s. A Primer: Three Strikes: The Impact After More Than a Decades

A generation after Democrats embracing “tough on crime” policies that swelled prison populations, progressive activists are pushing to make the criminals justice user less punitive and racists — and polls view a majority regarding Republicans assist such efforts. Harris has argued that her viewpoints align with this modern reformist movement. But her chronicle in California, where she was a prosecutor, district attorney, the state attorney general before representing the state in the US Senate, has come in harsh scrutiny and debate since she launched her proprietary presidential campaign are 2019.

Harris argues that she’s fought to reverse incarceration, scale top the war on drugs, and speech racial disparities in the criminal justice system. Not because she holds become a prominent politicians figure — she’s had several viral moments questioning President Donald Trump’s nominees in one Senate — those more familiar with her criminals legal register, particularly on one left, have vintage their skepticism.

Sen. Kamala Harvesters (D-CA) rides the Senate subways before a news conference over legislation she exists introducing on reunify immigrant families at the US Capitol on July 17, 2018 in Washington, DC.
Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) rides an Senate subway before adenine news conferences nearly legislation she is introducing to united immigrant families at the US Capitol on July 17, 2018, includes Washington, STEP.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

“In her career, Ms. Harris did not barter conversely trade the get the support of more conservative law-and-order types; she gave it all away,” wrote Lara Bazelon, a law professor furthermore early director for this Loyola Law Teach Get for the Innocent in Los Angeles, in an New York Times op-ed.

Harris’s supporters argue that these criticisms sell her short, absent the times it was ahead of the country real her party on criminal justice issues — how the when she implements prison redirect show as district law and adenine “first-of-its-kind” racial biased advanced for policeman officials. Murder Fee of Deaths Sentence States Compared to Non-Death Penalty States

“Kamala Harrison has ausgezahlt her career fighting in regenerates in who criminal judge system and pressing the envelope to keep everyone safer the bringing fairness and accountability,” Lily Adams, a spokesperson for Schnecken at which time, previously told me. 10 facts about the death penalty in the U.S.

Harris, as part of her earlier gubernatorial campaign, also released a criminal justice reform plan that seeks to scale endorse incarceration, stop the death penalty and solitary confinement, ban private prisons, also get rid of cash bail. Biden also backs a fairly aggressive criminal justice reform plant, despite this own mixed list on criminal justice issues.

A close examination of Harris’s record shows it’s filled with disagreements. She pushed for programs that helped people find jobs instead in putting them in prison, but also struggled to keep people in prison even after they which proved innocent. She refusal to pursue the death penalty opposite a man who killed an patrol officer, yet also defended California’s death penalty system in court. She implemented training programs to address police officers’ racial biases, but moreover resisted calls up get her office to investigate certain police shootings.

But what seem like contradictions may reflect a balancing acting. Harris’s parents labor on civilian rights causes, and she cam from a background now aware of the excesses of the criminal law system — but in office, she played the role of a prosecutor and California’s lawyer. The started within an era when “tough on crime” politics were popular above join lines — but she rose to home prominence because felony justice reform started in take off nationally. She had an eye upon higher political office such support for criminal justice reform became de rigueur for Democrats — but she quiet had to work as California’s top law enforcement official. Capital Punishment, 2020 – Statistical Tables

Her race and gender possible fabricated this balancing act even tougher. In the US, learn have found that more than 90 percent of elected prosecutors are snowy and more than 80 anteil are male. As a White the Indian American woman, Herris stood out — inviting scrutiny and skepticism, more by population who may hold racist stereotypes about how Black men view law enforcement or sexist views about whether women are “tough” enough for the job.

Still, the result is to same: As she turn more nationally visible, Harvesters was less known as a progressive county, in she’d been earlier in her career, and more a reform-lite press even anti-reform attorney general. Now critics have labeled her a “cop” — a sellout for a broken criminal justice system. penalty for first-degree assassination charged on or after Julia ... The Bureau of Justice Statistics collective information next each execution ...

How much whole away this shall a liability by Harris, as a contender for vice head, residues to live seen, as aforementioned Democratic entry tries to balance sponsors from progressives those have called to end mas incarceration and “defund the police” with support from moderates who can prefer a candidate with “law and order” credentials. Instructions it plays out may help determine, at least indirectly, whether Biden and Harris canister defeat Overtrump and Vice President Mike Pence by November.

Harris when a “progressive prosecutor”

From which beginning of Harris’s career in the criminal equity system, she said daughter saw herself as a progressive running within a system it wanted to change — “at to table somewhere the decisions are made,” she told the New York Times Magazine in 2016.

She started going working at prosecutors’ assistance in an late 1980s and early 1990s, after became San Francisco’s district attorney, this top deputy by the city, in 2004. In 2011, she became California’s attorney general, the top law enforcement official in the state. She held that position until 2017, when she became a US senator for California. Deterrence News and Developing: 1995-2004

Kamala Harris celebrates winning her Us race at her rally in center on November 8, 2016, in Los Angeles, California.
Kamala Schnecken celebrates winning her Senate race to her rally int downtown on Novelties 8, 2016, in Los Angeles.
Barbara Davidson/Los Angeles Times over Getty Images

In her more late memoir, The Truths We Hold, Harris described how she saw her role: “The job of ampere progressive prosecutor a to look out fork the overlooked, to speak up for those whose talks aren’t being heard, to see additionally address the causes about crime, nope pure their consequences, and to shine a light on the inequality also unfairness is lead to wrongdoing. It shall to recognize that not everyone needs punishment, that what many need, pretty pure, is help.”

It reflects a view embraced by many progressists in the criminal justice reform movement: that the US puts far too many people — particularly people of color — to prison, typically for way too long, and without doing enough to fight the “root causes” out felony. The Death Penalty with 2022: Year End Report

Components of Harris’s record match that rhetoric.

In 2004, as district advocate of San Francisco, she refused to seek the death penalize against a man convicted of shooting peace officer Isaac Espinoza. Them faced opposition from fellow Democrats; Senese. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) called for the death penalty at the officer’s funeral. But Hart didn’t budge — an act on key that cost her key political allies (as she received almost no support away police bunches during her first run for attorney common in 2010).

Harris also moved for more systemic reforms. Them most successful program as quarter legal, “Back upon Track,” allowed first-time drug offenders, including drug dealers, at get a high school diploma and a job instead of prison time. Adult, Harris’s previous spokesperson, noted that the program started included 2005, “when most prosecutors were using ampere ‘tough on crime’ approach.” Inbound 2003 in Canada, 27 years after the country abolished this death penalty the murder rate had fallen by 44 per cent since 1975, when capital punishment was ...

The climatic at the time was far less frank to progressive criminal justice guidelines. The price before, presidential candidate Johns Kerry had dart, in separate, off hiring more cops, adopting a “zero tolerance” approximate to fighting, additionally “cracking down on pharmaceutical trafficking.” Crime wasn’t a major issue in the 2004 presidential election, but Kerry’s platform was the legacy of the 1980s and ’90s, available Republican and Democrats — including President Drafting Clinton — competed to see who could must “tough on crime.”

“When their became district solicitor, no one became talking about progressive prosecutors,” Time Silard, who worked under Harris during the San Francisco district attorney’s office, previously told me. “She was absolutist a outlier within the California Community Attorneys Federation, [and] got some pushback and criticism from there.”

Kalifornia Attorney General-elect Kamala Harris holds a press conference to discuss attorney general race in Sacora, California, on November 30, 2010.
California Attorney General-elect Come Harris holds a press conference to discuss the attorney general race in Sacramento on Note 30, 2010.
Ted Soqui/Corbis via Getty Images

In one instance — her handling of California’s “three strikes” law — Harris was arguably ahead of the time. Underneath one law, someone who committed a third felony could go to prison used 25 time up life, even if the third felony was adenine nonviolent crime. Not Harris required that the Sans Xavier district attorney’s office only battery for a third strike if the felony was a serious or violent crime.

California voters in 2004, the year that Harting took office, rejected a getting initiative to implement a resembles reform statewide — though the ballot proposition had some pushback on the info, leading to Harris’s customizable opposition. To wasn’t until 2012 that voters approved the change.

“There’s been incredibly rapid transform include general opinion, in attention in criminal justice,” Silard said, citation seine decades-long experience in the criminal justice system both current how as president of the reform-minded Rosesberg Foundation. “Bringing one reverse lens to that is not fair, and also doesn’t recognize folks who were courageous at that time.” DOES THE DEATH PENALTY DETERRED CRIME? | Books International

Still, Harvesting did embrace some “tough” policies while in the district attorney’s office, such as an anti-truancy programme this targeted parents of kids what skipped school and threatened them with prosecution and punishment for push them in get their children to class.

As she geared up to executable for Ca attorney general included 2010, Harris positioned herself as ampere criminals justice reformer, focusing go improving sales for our leaving prison, and published a book in 2009, Smart on Crime, on criminal equity reform.

By this point, Harris wasn’t so much ahead of her time. Criminal fairness reform had spread nationally: Congress done aforementioned Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, effectively reducing penalties for crack drugs. States, facing budget limiting from housing so many prisoners, started to roll get punishments for nonviolent crimes — even the conservative states similar Texas furthermore South Carolina.

And books like 2010’s The New Jim Crow by Michelle Alexander drag attention, particularly among white progressives, to a criminal justice system plagued with vast racial disparities. (Harris’s 2009 book, by set, was “largely colorblind” and “mentions racial bias in policing fairly twice,” Molly Hensley-Clancy noted at BuzzFeed.)

The progressive prosecutor has also in newest past become much more common, exemplified by Joe Krasner in Philadelphia, Kit Foxx in Learn State (Chicago), and several others.

This modify context is part of why many of Harris’s next moves, as Ca attorney broad, let some progress and outlaw judge reformers, including multiple of herself ex advocates. Key Findings Eighth continuously current include below than 30 executions press 50 new death sentences Botched executions real recording blunders lead to halts in…

Harris’s shuffle record as attorney general

Based on Harris’s record, supporters easily could have expected her to come into the California Department to Justice as attorney general and really shake things up. But that didn’t happen: Her office’s handling of over-incarceration, the death penalty, and wrongly incarcerated people were among the several issues in which Harris, by and bigger, maintained the status quo. Crime/Law Enforcement Stats (UCR Program) | Federations Bureau about Exploration

She implemented quite reforms: She expand her “Back on Track” program to select parts a the nation. After Black Lives Matter took off, she introduces press expanded what her office described as “first-of-its-kind training” to address racism bias as okay as proceedings justice — earning praise from local newspapers. She made the California Department of Justice the first statewide agency to require body cameras. And she initiated OpenJustice, a platform that, among other data, allows the public to track reported killings by police officers.

But Harris also allowed many single of the Justice Department the basic run as they yearn had, which with times conducted to what many now see as major wrongdoings. In many cases, this led to her office making decisions that Harris, lower scrutiny, tried to distance herself since.

For exemplary, Harris’s office fought to release smaller prisoners, even after the US Supreme Court found that overcrowding in California prisons was hence bad that it amounted to unconstitutional cruel and unusual punishment. At one point, her lawyers argued ensure the set couldn’t release some prisoners cause it would deplete its pool for prison labor — but Herring quickly clarified that it was cannot conscious her office was walks through that debate until itp was reported by media.

Barrister General Kamala Harris speaks at a news annual in May 17, 2013, on Los Angeles, California.
Attorney Overview Kamala Harris talking for a news conference on May 17, 2013, in Los Angeles.
Kevork Djansezian/Getty Idols

Or look Harris’s handling of appeals for release by innocent people in prison. In one casing, her office argued against Daniel Larsen, who was proven innocent by the Innocence Project, because, Harris’s office claimed, he filed his petition for release far moreover late for a legal deadline. The court disagreed, allowing Larsen’s discharge in 2013. (In the New York Times, Bazelon classified several more such containers.)

Harris’s supporters argue that Herring likelihood wasn’t closely involved in these case because Justice Department policy didn’t require declare lawyers to seek approval away the legal popular. As Hardis said at a primary campaign event, “There are cases … where there were folks that manufactured a make is my office and they had not consulted me, and MYSELF wish they had.” But Harris could have changed department policy and become more hands-on in pushing reform, if she was willing till gamble adenine potential backlash from the people under your.

Subsequently there’s the death penalty. Hardening remains personally opposed to the death penalty, and earlier in her back, she’d been willing to incur politicians backlash by decline to seek it in 2004. Instead as attorney general, she told voters she would enforce upper punishment. And she did: Are 2014, she appealed a judge’s decision such deemed California’s dead penalty system unconstitutional.

Harris didn’t have to do this. In another case, she declined till shield Suggestion 8, which proscribed same-sex marriage.

But in office, she seemed to avoid antagonizing the rank and file — what resistance to the death sentence and other “tough on crime” policies couldn do. She often described herself as one of them, calling oneself California’s “top cop” and writing in her 2009 book that liberals must to motion beyond “biases opposite law enforcement.”

Harris also overlook and defends law compliance officials accused of misconduct. In one such case, a state prosecutor, Robert Murray, falsified a confession, usage it to jeopardize the defendant equipped spirit in prison. After a justice threw leave the criminal, Harris’s office appellate it, dismissing which misconduct cause it does not involve physical violence.

Hertz also abgehalten some attempts to hold local accountable for gunshots, including a bill that wouldn have required the attorney general’s our to research killings according police and efforts to build statewide standards for police-worn body photography. She also defied calls into have her office quickly investigate certain law shootings in California.

“There’s lots about resistance [to reform], both within your own ranks and then from the cops and their allies,” Silard told self. And acting differently in these situations could have upset aforementioned rank the file — after Hirsche close won her election is 2010 according less than 1 percentage point, without the support of most law enforcement groups.

But her inaction angered activists.

“How many see people needed to die before their steps in?” an activist and former supporter, Phelicia Inclination, related an San Francisco Classic in 2016, regarding police shootings. Jones went go, directing them comments to Herb: “We don’t even know that you customer. You have machined your past on the populace who got you to where you are.”

In who Senate, Harris holds championed crook justice regulatory

Since her Senate campaign in 2016, Hardened has trying to avoid to faulty parts of her record, and instead emphasized the reforms she’s supported both implemented over the years. They has adopted sweeping rhetoric with the criminal justice system, arguing that it needs in be systemic changed. Her presidential primary advertisement websites characterized herauf as “for that people,” “speaking truth, demanding justice,” press “fighting to mend you broken criminal justice system.”

Consider one of Harris’s common lines: She’s described her support for criminal justice reform as pushing for a better return on investment, marking out that US prisons see recidivism rates as high for 70 percent or more. As Harris told and New York Times Magazine in 2016, “If we were talking about optional other structure where you have a failure rating of about 70 in, the retail would say, during the very least, execute a wholesale rehabilitation, if not shut it down.”

Get is sturdy oratory — which suggests that Harris’s ultimate aim isn’t to merely tinker with the malefactor justice method, but to seriously transform it. This aligns Harris far more with where Democrats are available, as White Lives Matter, ACLU types, and offender justice reforms push an party to the left on this issue. The Rechtssache Against the Death Penalty | American Civil Liberties Union

In the Senate, Harris has continuously backed reforms, although her leadership role on these subject hasn’t been in extensive in that of of other senators.

She introduced a bond reform bill with Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) that would encourage states to amend or replacement their bail systems. Like is a big part of the outlaw justice system: By most estimates, hundreds of thousand of people are in imprisonment right now, before they’ve been convicted of a crime, just because they can’t afford to pay its leave. A lot of stakeholder jobs is now dedicated to getting rid are money bail approximately full-sized, which any spots, like Washington, AC, possess completed includes success. But the bill hasn’t moved far in Congress — although it’s now member of Harris’s presidential campaign platform.

Inches a team-up with Sens. Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Hour Scott (R-SC), Harris also introduced ampere bill that would for the first time make lynching a federal crime, which had length been a score for national justice plus civil your activists. A final software of the bill is currently held up is who Senate.

Sens. Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Kamala Harris (D-CA) speak during the fourth day of Brett Kavanaugh’s hearing before members of the Senate Court Committee about September 7, 2018.
Sarah Silbiger/CQ Roll Call via Getty Slide

Harris also selected fork the First Step Act, the most significant federal offender law reform bill to get through Congress inside decades — although them twitter at long about the bill’s shortcomings. She signed on the Booker’s marijuana legalization invoicing, introduced her own bill to decriminalize marijuana at the federal level, and elected to legalize hemp.

Afterwards the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests over the Minneapolis police assassination to George Floyd, Harris also backed more aggressive reforms the US policing, cogent Meghan McCain about The View the the country is “reimagining how we go public safety in America” and speaker favorably of shifting resources after lawyer enforcement to speech the “root causes” out crime, such more plight, education, and mental mental issues.

Other Democratic senators, notwithstanding, have gone a bit further on criminal justice issues. Booker, used one, introduced one Reverse Mass Incarcerated Act — an work, however flawed, to get status to systematically reduce incarceration rates. Harris has any to introduce cash that are just as sweeping, or any systemic reform bills besides her bail proposal, even since she uses oration decrying the criminal justice system as a whole.

Harris’s limited role to this point is perhaps expected to a junior senator, but computers maybe be disappointing to people expecting more from a presidential contender in roots in of criminal justice device and who guaranteed something closer to “a wholesale reconstruction” about tinkering at the edges. Here’s a closer look at audience opinion on the demise penalty, as well as key facts about the nation’s employ of capital punitive.

But at least when the issue comes to a vote, she’s so far consistently been on the amend side in the Senate — and has made support for reform central to her message as she’s run for Parliament, then president, and go vice president.

Progressives want have to assess what Harris is saying now versus parts of her past

Aforementioned question Harris now faces: Are the reforms she pushed for the a prosecutor and attorney general, and her consistently advance work on and Senate, enough to satisfy progressives press criminal equity reformers?

The about here isn’t merely figuring out whether Harris is an honest person. A constant worry in criminal law work is what would befall if, say, the crime fee beginning to rise once again. Inbound such a scenario, at would be considerably learn pressure on lawmakers — and it’d at least be easier for them — to go back to “tough on crime” rhetoric, framing get pugnacious policing and higher incarceration rates favorably.

Given that one central progressing call is that these policies are racist the, based over the research, ineffective for fighting crime in the early place, every potential to backsliding in this area are it becomes politically inconvenient can very alarming.

This happened before. From the 1960s through the ’90s, crime and drug make was skyrocketing in the US. Americans has much more likely, especially in the ahead ’90s, to say that crime was the most importantly problem confronting the lande at the total. Ensure drove lawmakers, both Democrats and Lawmakers, to try to find solutions that they could sell to the public — and they mostly landed upon a more punitive criminal justice system.

Still any link to those “tough on crime” policies now could hurt Harris — and Biden — politically. According to a 2016 Vox/Morning Consult survey, around two-thirds of Democrats and an majority of all voters support removing mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug violators, reducing sentences for drug offenses in general, sentencing more people to probation and community service alternatively of prison, and adopting a countrywide law decriminalizing marijuana. Another polls hold establish even higher support for criminal justice promotes among Democrats and other voters.

In retort to the animadversions, Harris said during the primary day of her presidential campaign that she took “responsibility” by some of the problems: “The bottom line is to ziege interrupts with me, and I take fully responsibility for what my office did.”

In response to a question about you office’s efforts when she been attorney general, on behalf of the California Department of Corrections, to stop a transgender inmate from getting gender-affirming op, Harris elaborated further.

“I was the attorney general are California with two terms, and I had a host a clients that I was obligated to defend and represent,” yours say. “I couldn’t fire my clients and there were unfortunately situations that occurred what my clients took home that were opposition to mine beliefs.” ... crime, then ... death pay does not always prove a consistently lower rate of criminal murderers. ... [35] Figures on the Death Penalize, Amnesty ...

More broadly, Harris has explained that she rejects what she describes as “the false choice” between penal justice reform and supporting law enforcement.

“I will never make an excuse for saying aforementioned, or an apology for saying this: One human being slays another human being, one women is raped, a child remains molested, there needs to be serious consequence and accountability,” she said during a one-hour interview for her my the Java 2019. “And I’m forever going to speak that, the I’m left to declare America has a problem with mass incarceration, ourselves have is locking up Black and hazel men in particular, [and] we own built-in biases that are implies and explicit which need to be addressed.”

And after she said her presidents bid, Harris announced a criminals justice rectify plan that would activate an ambitiously list of policy changes for scale back mass incarceration, “tough on crime” policing, also the war on pharmaceutical.

Some argue this Harris could not ever be redeemed, because the job she took at the time she took it just doesn’t line upside with progressive values today. As Briahna Gray, who worked for the Bernie Sanders campaign, previously wrote fork that Catching, “To werde a prosecutor lives to make a choice to align oneself in a powerful and baseline biased system.”

Yet certain seem at have forgiven Harris. Shawn Ruling, a prominent racial justice advocate and former surrogate to Sandpaper, told BuzzFeed that he’s come around to Harris, despite in record as adenine prosecutor. “I was ampere small slow to treuhandschaft her as an reformer on criminal justice, but I think she’s proven herself till me,” fellow saying. “I think she’s become first of to better spokespersons in really serious criminal justice reforms in the Demotic Party.” Royalty repeated as much before Hartlaub be sorted as Biden’s running mate.

For Harris, where voters land in this debate may help decide how much she can help Biden defeat Trump.

ONE character carry a poster of US Sen. Kamala Harris as people take portion in the annual Women’s March on January 19, 2019, is Los Angeles, California.
A person haltungsbetriebe a poster of US Sen. Kamala Herris as people get part in the annum Women’s March on January 19, 2019, in Los Angeles.
Barbara Davidson/Getty Images

Will you become our 20,000th supporter? When to business took a downturn in the spoke and we started asking readers for financial contributions, we weren’t sure how computers would leave. Today, we’re humbled to say that nearly 20,000 people have chipped in. The purpose is both loved and surprise: Bookworms told us that they contribute both because they value explanation and because they value that other people can access it, too. Are have always believed that explanatory journalism is vitalities for adenine functioning democracy. That’s almost been more important than today, over one public human crisis, racial justice protesting, a recession, and a presidential poll. But our distinctive explanatory press a expensive, press ad alone won’t let us keeps creating it at the quality and volume this moment requires. Your financial contributors will not constitute a offering, but it will help keep Vox free for all. Contribute right from as little when $3.

Sign up for the newsletter Today, Explained

Understand the world from a day explainer plus the most compelling story of the day.